
Monday was a big day for I, Doughbot. I was on the ground and in the field for a large rally held at Toronto's Queen's Park in 'defence' of 'traditional' marriage.
Bill C-38, otherwise known as the Civil Marriage Act, has passed second ready and been sent to committee. After last week's budget scare, it appears that the legislation once again has a real chance of passing.
This was my first protest and, at least initially, I couldn't help but feel out of place. Wearing a pair of cargos, I wandered the crowd with a pen stuck behind my ear, a camera in my hand and a tape recorder in my pocket. It was hard not to feel small each time I ran into a major media outlet -- OMNI, CTV and the CBC were all there. In the beginning, I found it difficult to approach people without a camera crew or boom mike to help establish an air of legitimacy, but the crowd accepted me as just another journalist and were eager to answer my questions.
A large stage had been erected near the entrance to the legislature, flanked by a booming public address system that carried speeches and music out of the park and into the city.
The police were there, in force, separating the
sea of 3,000 demonstrators from a small group of perhaps
60 counter-protestors. Later in the day I discovered a group of
mounted riot police around the side of the legislature building and just out of sight of the rally, ready in case the passion of either side erupted in violence.
There were people of all ages in the crowd, but more adults and seniors than young people. Accompanied by their parents,
some children cheered and held placards, however, most of the kids quickly grew bored and snuck off to
play cards or read a book. Much was made by various speakers of the crowd's demographics.
Rev. Tristan Emmanuel, the rally's organizer and a powerful and charismatic speaker, asked us to consider the optics of a rally where Sikhs, Muslims, Jews and Christians, all gathered together at the doorstep of the provincial legislature to protest same-sex marriage. Upon such consideration, however, I quickly realized that there were no visible Sikhs or Muslims in attendance. The crowd was almost entirely white and Chinese and it was undeniably Christian.
Such misrepresentation was the theme of the day. One speaker claimed that two thirds of Canadians oppose same-sex marriage when most polls show
Canadians are evenly split on the issue. Another referred to the recent
Supreme Court reference as the court's "final word" on the issue of same-sex marriage. The reality is that the Supreme Court has yet to rule on whether the current definition of marriage is constitutional. Perhaps most frustrating was how, time and again, speakers made appeals to tradition in asserting their position -- a common
logical fallacy. Mark, a counter-protestor who said he had come to Queen's Park in support of equality, noted, "I don't hear very many concrete arguments, unfortunately. All I want to know is how gay marriage affects these people’s lives. Hopefully, someone can explain it to me."
I too was looking for an explanation. What drove these people to give up part of their long weekend and travel, sometimes for hours, to protest the marriages of people they've never met? Darren, the first person I met at the rally, said that Christianity plays a big role in his support for 'traditional' marriage. He was there "to defend one man, one woman" and to support his brother, who was speaking that day. 17-year-old Krista and 18-year-old Cassandra described their primary motivation for attending as their belief in the "biblical view of one man and one woman". They were there to defend marriage "because God set it that way". Steve, who had come in from Kitchener, was protesting because he believes same-sex marriage is "unbiblical" and won't help a country "founded on the biblical stance of marriage". He came the closest to offering a concrete explanation for how Bill C-38 might affect his life. "For my children," he said, "there's the issue of other kids at school having two moms and two dads."
At least one speaker crossed the line when he began attacking homosexuals directly. Tony Copple, of The Anglican Gathering of Ottawa, asked why there was so little opposition in Parliament to the pending same-sex marriage legislation. "Perhaps many people don't know what is the nature of sex acts between homosexuals," he suggested. "Our bodies were designed for heterosexual sex, just look at them! And while I do appreciate that 2% of the population prefer less savory alternatives, to legitimize and sanctify their unions by calling them marriage is an act of sabotage against all of us."
The rally wound down a little after 2 p.m. and the park began to clear. Streams of people exited as the counter-protestors chanted and waved goodbye from across the police line. As people left they were approached by marshal’s with
large plastic buckets collecting donations for the cause. This is the money they hope will propel their movement forward and eventually allow them to exert enough pressure on MPs to force them to kill the bill. The same strategy has proven immensely effective in the U.S. and is being purposely exported by large American conservative and religious organizations.
Once the crowd had cleared, I ventured back to the stage where a group of black evangelicals had congregated and subsequently worked themselves into a trance.
I found Mark and his friend Amanda there too. Amanda held a small rainbow flag high above her head as she and Mark quietly debated with a man holding one of the many "Defend Marriage" placards that still littered the park. It seems that, despite the raw emotions and animosity I witnessed that day, these people were still willing to come together for the purpose of understanding.