Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Sorry, Your Application Has Been De-Kleined

Ralph Klein the Cowboy

"Hands off that there definition, partner!"

Alberta Premier and local gunslinger Ralph Klein fought the redefinition of marriage to the bitter end, going so far as to threaten to ruin civil marriage for everyone by having the province pull out of the marriage business altogether. He's since backed down and acknowledged that the new, inclusive definition of marriage is a reality. The fight for marriage is over and Klein has lost.

The Premier can't seem to leave well enough alone, however, and plans to introduce legislation allowing officials, including marriage commissioners, to refuse to marry gay or lesbian couples on the basis of cultural values or religious belief. I strongly support the religious freedom of church officials, but Klein is going too far by extending protection to civil servants. Marriage commissioners are government representatives and bound to follow the law of the land. They have no more right to refuse to marry same-sex couples than a Saudi working at the MTO has to refuse to issue a driver's license to a woman. If a commissioner finds himself unable to perform his duties, then he should find another job. At least a dozen Manitoba commissioners found themselves in just this situation and were forced to quit. Ontario also requires their commissioners to perform marriages for same-sex couples. There is no reason for Alberta not to follow suit.

I appreciate the fact that the marriage war is over and that these peripheral issues will eventually sort themselves out. I also know that the redefinition of marriage will, over time, translate into even stronger public support for gay and lesbian causes and may eventually open the eyes of even the most hardened traditionalists -- including Mr. Klein.

7 Comments:

  • Cool picture, it is of Klein in 1986 as Mayor of Calgary. Imagine knowing then that the guy standing before you would be Premier for over a decade!

    I would have been one to De-Klein the option.

    By Blogger Rick Barnes, at 11:07 PM  

  • To Rick: Thanks for the extra info. That picture of Klein kind of reminds me of our former Mayor, Mel Lastman. Both look like they'd jump at the chance to sell me a used Chevy.

    By Blogger Doughbot, at 11:31 PM  

  • Poor senile old Mel. Frankly, a used Chevy would be a step up for the "Bad Boy" of North York politics.

    By Blogger Matt, at 7:05 AM  

  • To Matt: His Square kicks ass, though. Nathan Phillip has nothing on him.

    By Blogger Doughbot, at 9:54 AM  

  • His square does indeed kick ass. Much as he was a goof as Toronto mayor, I had a soft spot for him when I lived in North York. Top-notch libraries, twice-weekly garbage pickup, good recycling and snow removal. Of course, I moved away from Toronto two years before his pet project, the Sheppard Subway finally went through - which would have passed within a 10 minute walk from my parents' house.

    By Blogger Matt, at 10:08 AM  

  • Actually, there is a reason for Alberta not to follow suit: they don't want to.

    As long as some gov't representatives are willing to perform the service, there's no reason to force those who disagree on moral grounds to do it.

    Those who don't agree with same sex marriage and don't wish to perform the services will be following the law of the land - Alberta's.

    Ralph Klein hasn't been Canada's most successful politician by not following the will of the people. If the man can do anything, it's read which way the wind is blowing.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:30 PM  

  • To Anonymous #1: I appreciate your comments, though I disagree. When I speak of marriage commissioners following the law of the land, I'm referring to federal law. Only the federal government has the right to define who can and can't be granted marriage licenses. In this case, they have said that all adults, regardless of sexual orientation can be issued a license. This is the law, whether or not Alberta chooses to recognize it as such.

    As to there being "no reason to force those who disagree on moral grounds" to perform marriages for same-sex couples, I think that's untrue for both practical reasons and reasons of principle.

    A practical reason: Imagine I want to get married on a particular day. I live in a small town with only two marriage commissioners at city hall. One is on vacation and the other refuses to marry me "on moral grounds." Who is supposed to perform the ceremony? Just as someone can be fired for not being able to work Saturdays or Sundays, the commissioner in this case should be let go for being unable to provide the public with the service for which he was hired.

    A reason of principle: Marriage commissioners are government agents. If the government allows a particular commissioner to refuse to serve certain members of the public, then the government is guilty of discrimination. I tried to make this clear when I asked you to imagine an MTO agent refusing to issue a driver's license to a woman because he does not believe women should drive. Sure, another employee could serve this woman. "I'm sorry, I'm unable to serve you. Please wait for the next available agent," sounds like a relatively benign request, but it is pure discrimination and should not be condoned.

    By Blogger Doughbot, at 5:30 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home